I am Writing this Post of My Own Free Will

If you want to believe in free will, science has a little less cause to argue against you. Turns out that experiments establishing the case against conscious free will may have been misinterpreted:

“Libet argued that our brain has already decided to move well before we have a conscious intention to move,” says Schurger. “We argue that what looks like a pre-conscious decision process may not in fact reflect a decision at all. It only looks that way because of the nature of spontaneous brain activity.” 

So what does this say about free will? “If we are correct, then the Libet experiment does not count as evidence against the possibility of conscious will,” says Schurger. 

Cognitive neuroscientist Anil Seth of the University of Sussex in Brighton, UK, is impressed by the work, but also circumspect about what it says about free will. “It’s a more satisfying mechanistic explanation of the readiness potential. But it doesn’t bounce conscious free will suddenly back into the picture,” he says. “Showing that one aspect of the Libet experiment can be open to interpretation does not mean that all arguments against conscious free will need to be ejected.”

Just remember: never question science. Even when it says something today that’s the opposite of what it said 30 years ago. It’s science!

Via Instapundit (p.b.u.h.)

Leave a Reply